So they couldn't shoot him with a stun gun instead? There was no need. Although I am sceptical that he charged at the police, even if we were to say he did, the fact that they chose to kill him instead of doing any of the below says a lot about the type of officers being hired, how they are being trained and what they were most ready to do in that type of situation. Below are just some alternatives they could have resorted to instead.
Below is a link to a website that explains more bout what some of the alternative options that could have been.
https://soapboxie.com/government/Wha...-by-the-Police
- Shoot him with a pepper spray gun
- Use tear gas on him
- Shoot him with a stun gun
- Shoot him with a Web Shot device
- Shoot him with a dazzler riffle (a type of Laser Rifle)
- Shoot him in the leg with live ammo
Below is a link to a website that explains more bout what some of the alternative options that could have been.
https://soapboxie.com/government/Wha...-by-the-Police
Comment